2009+World+History+Final+Project+D+DK

  Did the Apollo 11 Mission Land On the Moon? Was it a Hoax?   = =

= =

Pro-Apollo
===-Footprint  ===




=== Are they heroes or actors? Did the Apollo 11 mission really succeed? Or did NASA and the government spend billions of dollars just to cover it up? Would they have risked the trust of the whole world, in order to land on the moon? The final question may be, what final evidence will end this mystery once and for all? ===  ===In July of 1969, more than 600 millions of people all over the world watched their television screens as the space shuttle landed on the moon. Out of the millions of people watching, the head of a company's technical publications where the Saturn V rocket was built, named Bill Caysing just couldn’t believe it to be real. His evidences helped many other people in the world from that point on, conspiracy theories have developed to what may seem to say that the Apollo 11 mission were just one large setup. (Apollo Moon Landing Hoax) ===  ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">The show //Did We Land On The Moon?// said more than 20% of the United States citizens are believers in the moon landing to be a hoax. Hundreds of conspiracy ideas are revealing themselves from the photos and the videos taken from this trip to the moon. The pictures and clips from the actual flight to the moon will now be the deciding factor if the Apollo 11 landed on the moon on July 20, 1969. With the hundreds of conspiracy theories on this issue, just the equal amounts of information are told to say that they had landed on the moon.So what really happened? Did they land on the moon that was thought to be near .017% of success at that time? ===

===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">Did the excellent technology, sound decisions, and tests really lead to the three Apollo 11 astronauts to land on the moon? NASA and many others, from the evidences of the lunar soil and rocks would say so, but can we even trust these items? (Gilruth and Low 1) ===

Back To Top <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">

==<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">**<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',Times,serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 255); background-color: rgb(0, 0, 128);">History/ Background Information ** ==

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">Moon. The one words that meant world domination in the mid-1900s. United States was the most dangerous country in the world. They had created the atomic bomb, which could kill more than fifty thousand people in one period of time. Even though they were been allies during the war, United States and Russia soon became rivals.(Mason 10) ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> In the frightening world, the Soviet Union had to create their own weapon of mass destruction, so that they wouldn't be "crushed" by the United States. As time passed by, the Soviets became the most developed and powerful in the world. === <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> By 1949 they not only created and developed their own atomic bomb, they were able to send a rocket over 1,300 feet into the air. Not much later, the scientist who had developed the rocket, named Sergei Korolev finally designed and launched the first satellite, Sputnik 1, into space. (Beck, 481)Until now, the American population had felt that they were safe from the Pacific Ocean to the west and the Atlantic Ocean to the east from attack. (Mason 12)All of a sudden, the United States became vulnerable of the Soviet Union, because this satellite could precisely measure and tell where the missiles should aim to hit the target. ===

===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> The Soviet military noticed that attaching an atomic bomb to the rocket would have given them the ability to attack any part of the world. They had wanted to build a military missile base on the moon. === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">(Facts and Info about the Fake Moon Landing) Though the United States were nowhere near the race to space from the Soviets, in April 9, 1959 a new organization called Mercury intended to put the first American men into outer space. ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> The space race continued. The Soviet Union had created a larger gap against the United States. They had started to create probes that were sent into the direction of the moon and were even able to put the first living creature into space. The United States war for controlling the space had begun to fall apart. Finally after mistake after mistake, and years of hard work, the United States had finally sent the first man into space by the Apollo 9 mission, where the astronauts safely returned to Earth. (Mason 14) === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> The day had come. The day that the whole world had been waiting for. The first person on the moon. On July 16, 1969 three astronauts, Neil Armstrong, Mike Collins, and Buzz Aldrin rode the command module called Columbia to the moon. ===

Back To Top <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> <span style="line-height: 25px; font-size: 17px; font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 255); background-color: rgb(0, 0, 128);">Hoax Theories

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">Almost 40 years passed since the actual event of the astronauts being launched to the moon. Many theorists state that NASA had created the clips inside Area 51, the most facilitated area in the United States. The conspiracists from Did We Land On The Moon? such as Bill Caysing wondered, "Why would it be so heavily guarded, unless.. if they were hiding something?" ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">A movie that had been produced several years after the Apollo missions called Capricorn 1 show the whole world that with a four million dollar budget, very similar clips could be created to those of the real footage of Apollo 11. (Did We Land On The Moon?) ===

media type="custom" key="3941461"<span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype';">
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(255, 255, 255); background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">This clip is a section of the movie called Capricorn 1, which was a movie about the government creating clips to lie to the public about landing on mars. It is in a different language, but it clearly depicts the overall idea that there might have been a possibility of the government lying that NASA had gone to the moon in 1969. Sections of this clip shows some of the effects that had been used in the movie, which could definitely be thought to be similar to the Apollo 11 clips. ===

===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> With the budget of billions of dollars, Bill Kaysing and many scientists and several astronauts state that NASA could indeed have created the most expensive film at that time. === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">The main arguments that conspiracists think the moon landing to be a hoax by the United States government are from the evidences of unrealistic footprints, not a sight of stars when they should be clearly visible, flag waving even though there is no atmosphere, uneven shadows which may indicate more than one light source, unknown causes of mysterious death, and lastly death or diseases that should have occurred from the shuttle moving through the Van Allen Belts. (Did We Land On The Moon?) ===

Back To Top <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 255);">Unrealistic Footprint
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">When Neil Armstrong had taken the photo of Buzz Aldrin's boot print, hoax believers wondered… If there was no water or any type of liquid in space how come the moon dust were clumped together like wet sand. Many scientists have compared the lunar dust to be very similar to those of sand on Earth, but they wondered how and why the dust had left the trace of the footprint. Like those of dry sand dunes, shouldn’t the footprints have disappeared? Since it wasn’t on the moon, conspiracists say that it must have been a footprint of wet sand on Earth. Just why were there so many prints created when there can be no atmosphere and liquid to create them? ===

Back To Top <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">Believers in this Apollo 11 moon landing to be a hoax wondered how a flag rippled in the lunar atmosphere. Bill Kaysing and many other people have claimed that the American flag would have waved from the gust of wind that came in when filming this (Picture to the Right) in a set. The conspiracists say that since there is no atmosphere on the moon, the flag shouldn’t be waving, therefore these scenes were taken from an area on Earth that had gusts of wind when filming the scenes. (Did We Land On The Moon?) ===

Back To Top <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 255);">The Stars
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(255, 255, 255); background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> AS The conspiracists have said, there are No stars in the background of any of these photographs ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> === <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">

===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">Why are there no stars in any of the pictures? Bill Kaysing from //Did We Land On The Moon?// had provided this conspiracy theory, stating that if the astronauts were actually on the moon, they would have spotted the stars, better than on Earth. From the photos, where the stars should be bright as candles, we can't see any stars from any of the space photos above. No astronaut has talked about the fabulous stars, which should have been visible. Amazingly, from more than 80% of the Apollo photos, stars cannot be spotted. As stated by Maria Blyzinsky, Curator of Astronomy at the Greenwich Observatory in London, since there is no atmosphere, stars should have been more visible than on Earth. How come there were no stars in any of the photos? Could there have been just a black background? Since there are no stars anywhere in the photos when there should have been, hoax believers theorize this point as one of the many that would show that NASA couldn’t have ever gone to the moon during this time. (Costella) === <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> Back To Top <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> A great question form the conspiracists, from the pictures from the moon are how the shadows seem to cast themselves in totally opposite directions. The conspiracists state that shadows pointing at different directions and lengths would have been a definite reason that there was definitely more than one light source on the objects. Since an astronaut wouldn’t be able to cast a larger shadow when standing further away from the light that is brightening them both, another source of light could have been used. The astronaut is seen to also be shorter than his colleague, and also further away from the light soruce, but is seen to have a larger shadow. The conspiracists state that this wouldn't happen if there was only one light source. Since one of the shadows is longer than the other, they say that more sources of light would have been used. The photo to the right shows exactly the hoax theorists explanations. ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">[[image:Shadow14.jpg width="252" height="279" align="right" caption="Uneven Shadows"]]
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">The hoax believers state that the shadows in some of the moon photos are seen to not show correctly if the sun had been in the specific direction. The picture (TO THE RIGHT) shows the main source of light coming from the west, and the shadows due East, but the rocks near the bottom of the picture are seen with the shadows indicating that the sunlight had come from a light source to the North West. If there had been two light sources like many conspiracy theorists say, the picture would fall perfectly into place, with the right angle of the lights and shadows. (Apollo Moon Landing Hoax) === <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> === <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> ===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">“Some of the lighting from the films of NASA also seem to be very unrealistic,” states a believer in the hoax. The picture from NASA should probably show the astronaut covered in a shadow since the sun light is coming from behind, but in the photos, the whole front part of his body also seems to be covered in the bright light. === <span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> Another interesting fact about shadows would have been the problems that could have been related to the Hasselblad still cameras of the 1960s. Since the moon had been lacking light many of the times during the Apollo missions, the cameras were fitted with with lenses that could show more objects even when there was a lack of light. Adding on to the 7% of light reflectivity of the moon, which scientists say is similar material as asphalt. Many people question how such precise pictures (One on Left) could have been created from the Hasselblad cameras.. "They had been from still cameras, and since no artificial lighting had been used, how were these cameras able to take several photos, which were sharper and brighter than the cameras that were used to make movies in the dark at this period of time?" (Cosnette and Lloyd) From a mission, the photo is seem to show how the shadows really should have been, but from the still pictures of Buzz Aldrin jumping off the ladder, it seems that he had been artificially lit. From the comments of the conspiracy believers, since there is no atmosphere on the moon and the reflectivity of the lunar surface being low, the body shouldn’t be seen. This is thought to be probably one of the greatest arguments that the conspiracists have given to the public to think about. === <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">Back To Top

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 255);">Unknown Causes of Deaths
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">From the show //DID WE LAND ON THE MOON?// by Fox, it stated that ten astronauts, or 15% of NASA’s astronaut core had died “under mysterious circumstances” during the time of Apollo. Could they have killed innocent people to keep their secrets? The mysteries seem to be from accidents in high performance jet planes and accidents in untested spacecraft. In the final minutes of his Gus Grissom’s life, an astronaut who was killed during the Apollo 1 Fire, said, “Hey, you guys in the control center, get with it. You expected me to go to the moon and you can’t even maintain telephonic communications over three miles.” He was also showing doubtful signs right before they were supposed to take off. He also said, "How are we going to get to the moon if we can't even talk between two buildings." These statement by Gus Grissom, conspiracists say were exactly how he had felt with the Space Missions in the United States. As the years went by, Gus Grissom’s family had stated that the Apollo 1 fire couldn’t have been an accident. They have stated that NASA hadn’t been telling them the whole truth to what had happened or who was responsible for his death. (Death of Apollo Personnel) Were Gus Grissom and his friend astronauts intentionally killed because they had known way too much about the “fake” program? Many people wonder why the space craft had been on fire, and it still remains as a mystery today. === <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(255, 255, 255); background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Clip from "From the Earth to the Moon" about Apollo 1 Fire Investigation. It describes about what NASA thinks about this issue and how they answer to what really happened. They reply by saying that they really don't know, which may indicate that they might be hiding something from the public.

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">media type="youtube" key="V0W9bQ2Jg3A" height="344" width="425"
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">There was more that the conspiracists believe the moon landings to be a hoax. Thomas Baron had been a inspector for the safety of Apollo 1 construction. In the later year, he testified before Congress that man would never be able to make it to the moon with this type of construction. He submitted over 500 pages of report to tell about what he had found. A former NASA Spokesman named Julian Scheer said, “Thomas was real fear that the program could be stopped their in this track.” Conspiracists state that NASA would have had thought Thomas Baron to be a danger to NASA their crucial secrets on what really happened. Exactly one week later his testimony, his car was found to be ran over by a train. The whole family, Baron, his stepdaughter and his wife were found to all have been killed. The reports and findings that he had written are noticed to have been disappeared, and even to this day nobody has found these mysterious pieces of documents. (Thomas Baron and Astronauts Killed) Could NASA possibly be hiding something from the public? Would they silence people that may have been dangerous to their failures? The conspiracists would say it to be so. === <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">Lee Gelvani stated that he had convinced James Irwin, an astronaut of Apollo 15 to confess that the NASA had been covering up large secrets about the missions to the moon. From pieces of information that had been gathered, Irwin was supposedly going to contact Lee to talk about the whole situation, but interestingly he had died of a heart attack in 1991. (Moon Landing Hoax Top 10 Reasons) ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">media type="youtube" key="MdQ7QN4nm-I" height="294" width="362"
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">This is the cryptic speech that conspiracists think Neil Armstrong is trying to say to the public about the lies that NASA has been holding back. === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">What does this have to do anything with the Apollo 11 hoax? Many conspiracists conclude that Neil Armstrong could have tried to tell the public about what had been happening with NASA and the Apollo missions, as to the missions being fake. NASA had shown what they were able to do, by showing the examples of James Irwin, Thomas Baron in order to silence what he might say to the public. In order for their family and themselves to not be harmed by the NASA and the government, these astronauts such as Neil Armstrong may not have said anything. In the video to the right, conspiracists point out a message that Armstrong is trying to send to the public. He is noticed to be stuttering and seems to be hiding something secret that he wishes to tell. === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">Many conspiracists stated that these deaths can’t just coincidences that have occurred to the astronauts during this time, but people who have tried to tell the public about NASA and their deepest secrets. ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">Back To Top <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 255);">Van Allen Belt
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">One of the most centerpiece claims is that the Apollo astronauts shouldn’t have been able to pass through the highly radiated Van Allen Belt without having serious problems back on planet Earth. The Van Allen Belt could be defined as energetic charged electrons that revolve around the Earth. There are three radiation belts in this system, and each one is thought to contain a certain radiation rates. The closer the belt is to Earth, the less radiation it would contain.(Van Allen Belt) === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">Solar flares during the trips may have affected the Apollo astronauts in dangerous ways. The Van radiation belt fields, which the nearest on from Earth would be around 272 miles, the astronauts would not have been able to pass through this radiation without having the injuries. From sources of many scientists studying the radiation, it seems that the sunspot cycle, which would create much more radiation in space had been the years around 1969 to 1970, or the year of the Apollo 11 mission. (Cosnette and Lloyd) For those who are confused right now, a believer in this hoax had given a prime example of why he had thought this mission wouldn’t have been possible. From //ufos-aliens.co.uk//, the author says, “when Dentists or Doctors take X ray pictures they either leave the room or stand behind a sheet of thick lead to shelter from the radiation. Why did NASA only use a small sheet of aluminum to protect the astronauts when they knew that the radiation levels in Space and on the Moon's surface would be many hundreds of times more deadly?” Many people have noticed this fact and wondered if NASA would actually risk the astronauts’ lives to gain the recognition that they wanted for themselves. (Cosnette and Lloyd) === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">In 1962 the United States government planned a high-altitude nuclear test through the Van Allen belt, which was 248 miles above Earth. This operation called Operation Starfish was project by sending The Megaton Nuclear Bomb into space with the goal to try to force an unnatural corridor through the belt. These tests by the government had changed the shape and intensity of the lower Van Allen Belt. On July 19 of 1962, NASA announced to the public crowd that this operation of the high altitude nuclear test had caused the formation of a new radiation belt, which was estimated to be around 400 to 1600 kilometers more to the lower parts of the Van Allen Belt. The exact number of the belts created by the USSR experiment was found to be around three, between 7000 to 13000 kilometers above the earth. From these nuclear tests, the Van Allen Belt has changed greatly since this time, and many scientists believe that it could take hundreds of years for these belts to return to their normal levels. (Bertell) === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">These belts, estimated by Mary Bennett, the author of ‘Dark Moon- Apollo and the Whistle-Blowers’ stated that these belts were 100 times more intense than the original belts. === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">The conspiracists think just wondered then, “What lengths would NASA have taken to shield the astronauts against the radiation?” From their research and critical evidence, at least a minimum of ten centimeters of aluminum had to be worn in order for the astronauts to not be seriously injured by the Van Allen Belt. They state that since the walls of the Apollo 11 craft was created as thin as possible for purposes of keeping the enough air inside to be able to withstand the pressures in space, the Apollo mission could not have succeeded.(Cosnette and Lloyd) Since they wouldn’t have been able to live the dangers of the radiation, the conspiracists conclude that the mission couldn't possibly have succeeded. === <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">Back To Top

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">

<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); background-color: rgb(0, 0, 128);">Pro-Apollo Viewpoints
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">Many hoax believers from the evidences provided above have stated that the Apollo 11 Mission to the moon had to have been planned out by the government, but NASA and most of the population in the world believe otherwise. In science, if a certain conclusion were stated to be wrong or proven to be wrong at least ONCE, then the whole argument would be wrong. ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">This can be used perfectly for this Apollo mission in 1969. When the conspiracists concluded from their evidences that the astronauts couldn’t have landed on the moon, NASA and moon landing believers proved several of the arguments by the conspiracists to be unrealistic by the main reason of the differences between the moon environment and earth. If a certain argument is proved to be wrong, then it wouldn’t be enough to back up the main conclusion, but if there are some arguments that can’t be argued against, with no possible way of proving it to be incorrect, there lies a possibility of the moon landing to be a hoax. The three words that NASA had written on the front page of their website when asked what they thought about the hoaxers were, "Yes we did" (We really did go to Moon) ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">Back To Top

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> The surface of the moon is unlike that of the Earth. The lunar dust, as stated by Robert Heinlein, an expert on the moon’s surface, stated that the lunar dust is nothing like sand. Even though sand is the closest substance to the lunar dust, the two are known to be very different, because of the fact that they are on different places in space. NASA states that the particles of the lunar dust are thought to be much more irregular and smaller than of materials on Earth that may have been thought to be similar. While the sand on earth is from the weathering and erosion of rocks and of the rock particles, the lunar soil are the small minuscule pieces that have been broken off from the asteroid collisions. (Redzero's Moonhoax) The footprints, as NASA says, are held in place by friction, and since there’s no atmosphere on the Moon, there would have been no air for the lunar dust to erode the footprints. When compressed, because of the fact that there’s no atmosphere on the moon, the dust particles grip together very tightly and it would in fact keep the shape of the print, until other prints are made on top of it. This all happens, without water, which would disprove the theorists' argument. The believers in the moon landing state that this is one of the arguments by the hoax believers that have been proven to be incorrect. === media type="custom" key="3901691" ===<span style="background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">This video shows the moon print in a vacuum with similar materials as the lunar surface by the //Mythbusters// to show that clear footprints can be seen on the moon. === <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">Back To Top

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 255);">Fluttering of the Flag
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> Hoax believers would state that this is one of the main facts that help the moon landing to be a hoax. Since the flag was rippling in an environment with no air, they would state that the video footage couldn’t have been from the moon. The “other side” states that the flag had a pole with a horizontal bar that was attached at the top. (Plait) NASA noticed and planned ahead that there would be no wind on the moon, by adding a bar 90 degrees to the pole so that the flag wouldn’t be just hanging down the pole. Apollo supporters state that the bar had also not been the exact full length of the flag when it had been attached, which had made it slightly curl up to give the flag a flapping look in the photos. “That’s not enough proof,” the conspiracists may say. ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">[[image:fake2-flag.jpg width="378" height="281" align="right" caption="Flag Fluttering"]]
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> The main fact to help prove that this evidence by the conspiracists to have been incorrect was that after the astronauts had passed through the thin layer of dust with the pole, they had to twist the pole back and forth for it to go through the hard layers. This twisting movement as stated by Apollo believers, would have made the attached bar and flag flutter and look as if it was waving. === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">In all the videos of the flag looking as if it was “waving,” there was an astronaut with at least a hand on the pole or few seconds after the astronaut had touched it, which would have been to conclude that the astronaut was trying to stick the pole into the ground by twisting and pushing it. From this mission, the astronauts commented on how difficult it was to push the flag into the surface.(Redzero's Moonhoax) At about 9 to 11 inches down, supporters state that the astronauts had commented on the difficulty of pushing and twisting it into the ground. In order to get it firmly so that the flag pole wouldn’t fall, they say that the astronauts had twisted the pole repeatedly to get it deeply down from the surface. <span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">(Bara, Troy, and Hoagland) <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> The flagpole itself, as the Apollo supporters state, had been light and springy, meaning that it would have been harder for the astronauts to put it through the hard surface of the moon. From sources of NASA, the flagpole had continued to vibrate even after the astronauts had let go of it. The vibration would shake the bar on top of the flag and also help the flap the flag. ===

===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> In Newton’s First Law of Motion, Newton had stated that every object in the state of uniform motion would remain in that exact same state, unless if an outside force had been used against it. (Newton's Three Laws ) Without the air to stop the movement of the flag, from scientific resources of Apollo believers, it would continue to flap longer than a person may have expected. ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> media type="youtube" key="hMBCfuKs9i8" height="344" width="425"
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(255, 255, 255); background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">This video performed by the //Mythbusters//, a popular TV show helps support the fact of the flag would flutter quite a bit when an astronaut is trying to plant the flag down on the lunar surface. ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">Back To Top

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 255);">STARS
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> The Apollo believers state that any brightly lit foreground objects were captured not the dim objects, such as the stars. (Xenophilia) The astronauts, they say were out and on the moon during the day time, where the sun was shining down on the moon’s surface. To try to get the photos of the bright objects, such as the lunar module and the white spacesuits, a fast shutter speed was used. The astronauts were able to see the stars very clearly, but because of the fast shutter speed on the camera, not a single star, which would be trillions of miles away was to be caught on camera. For the astronauts to capture the background stars, they would have to use long exposure time, but the problem with this would be that the foreground would not be clear anymore. <span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> (Bara, Troy, and Hoagland) === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">The main goal, as stated by the Apollo believers was to take the lunar surface and to document the activities, not to take the pictures of stars, which can be seen on Earth. The Apollo believers have also stated that since it was the pictures were to be taken in an airless environment, the light had become much more intense, causing the exposure time to be much shorter. (Plait) Because of the shortage of the exposure time, the stars were not caught on camera. This had been the proof that there may not have been stars caught on camera, but it doesn’t disprove the conspiracy theory that a black backdrop was used. On //lunaranomalies.com//, the people took a further step in proving that these photos were taken on the moon, and that there were certainly stars in the background, but which weren’t caught on camera. Enterprise Mission investigators named Richard C. Hoagland, by enhancing some of the photographs from the Apollo missions they found out that the sky wasn't necessarily black. They had actually found out from the (To the Top Left) picture that it was in fact full of shapes that would seem to be close to stars. === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> Conspiracists may say, “Since it was from Apollo 14, and not Apollo 11, it doesn’t prove anything upon the first Apollo mission on the moon.” Apollo supporters state that since Apollo 14 had to have been real, from these photos, enhancing the Apollo 11 original photos would show to be the same results. Since the Apollo 14 could be proven to have occurred,the Apollo supporters state that there would be more possibilities of having the Apollo 11 as well as the other missions to be real. === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> To get pictures of the stars, from the Surveyor spacecraft cameras, it had to use a three-minute time exposure to record them. The average exposure time for a camera would be around 45000 times faster than the exposure required to take the pictures of stars in the lunar sky, or around one 250th of a second. The Apollo supporters state that the exposure time that was required would have been the main cause of the stars not being visible in the lunar airless sky. This, the supports say is the main disproves the statement by the conspiracy theorists. (Bara and Hoagland) ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">Back To Top

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 255);">Uneven Shadows
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">Levels. Apollo supporters state that the uneven surface of the moon surface would have created the shadows to be at different directions. Unlike the Earth, where there are some parts with the smooth even grounds, in the photos, the sun had been low in the sky, and the moon’s surface all around is very uneven.(Redzero's Moonhoax ) Going back to conspiracists’ argument of the appearance of having two light sources because the shadows were not parallel, the Apollo supporters state that if two light sources had been used, then there should be two sets of shadows. <span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> (Bara, Troy, and Hoagland) === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">From the pictures shown from the conspiracy theorists’ argument, each object casts only one shadow. This, the supporters of the landing would be the reason to prove that the conspiracy theorists’ argument to be incorrect. === ===<span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255); background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">**This video by the //Mythbusters//, help show the example of the uneven shadows, which would help create the different directions of shadows.** ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">Some photographs have unequal shadows, which the pro-hoaxers say is because more than one lighting had been used. One reason to this, the Apollo supporters say would have been because the longer shadow had been at higher hill than the shorter shadowed object. From these diagrams, as shown on the left, it shows that the uneven ground levels could have indeed created shadows, which seemed to be longer than another. ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">In the shadows, the astronauts are seen clearly, and from this reason, the hoaxers state that another light source would have been used to help with the astronaut details in an Earth environment. While the sun is the only direct light source, ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">[[image:shadow03.jpg align="right"]]
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">the light reflects off everything around the astronauts, the lunar surface and even the spacesuits of the astronaut taking the photograph. These photographs were also taken with the sunlight reflecting off of the photographer, which provided more light for the astronaut that was being photographed. (Redzero's Moonhoax)A very important reflection would also be the planet Earth. Earth’s reflection, with the reflection of the moon, and also the photographer, who was wearing a pristine white spacesuit, Apollo supporters state that the astronauts in the picture could definitely have been seen even in the shadow of the Lander. (Plait) ===

===<span style="color: rgb(0, 255, 255); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">The Photo to the Right Shows how the gray paper, very similar to the color of the moon surface can reflect some of the light to show the astronaut's body. === ===<span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">A //Mythbuster// Video that Shows how the Astronaut's Shape Can Be Seen Even Under a Shadow ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">media type="youtube" key="MtWMz51eL0Y" height="344" width="425"
<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">Back To Top

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 255);">Van Allen Belt
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">The main reason that the Apollo supporters believe why the astronauts weren’t killed by the radiation they would have received from the Van Allen Belts were from a simple answer. They say that they weren’t really affected by the radiation belts because they hadn’t stayed in the belts for a long enough period of time. They say that the Apollo astronauts had passed through the belt within less than an hour inside a spacecraft that had given some protection from the radiation. Apollo supporters state that NASA had noticed the problem of the Van Allen Belt, and that they had a solution to avoiding it. The best explanation for the astronauts to not have serious radiation problems were that the spacecraft flew at low orbit altitudes and when they were near the belts, they say that the spacecraft moved at high speeds, up to 25,000 miles per hour. <span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> (Bara, Troy, and Hoagland) ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">Back To Top

<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">MORE ARGUMENTS FROM THE CONSPIRACISTS
<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> ===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">These were only some of the arguments that had been brought up by the conspiracy theorists and proven to be wrong by the Apollo supporters. More arguments by the hoax theorists are.. === ===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> 1. Why are there shortened cross-arrow marks on some of the objects? Did NASA take the photos after they had edited the cross-arrows? ===

===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> 2. Two photos are seen to have identical backgrounds when they are in different areas on the Moon. ===



<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> 3. How was the filming of the Take Off done?
===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> 4. If Neil Armstrong had been the first man on the moon, who took the clip of him jumping off the LEM? ===

<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> 6. Why did Neil Armstrong only jump 18 inches if the moon had 1/6 gravity of the sun?
===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">7. In the conversations between astronauts and people on Earth, there are no pauses in them, when there should be at least 2 seconds of lag on the transmissions? What happened? 8. If the spacecraft landed on the Moon, wouldn't it have created a blast crater beneath the lander? ===

<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype';">
<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">Back To Top

<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">
<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">

<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> Some ideas that the theorists believe are unanswered are....
===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> 1. 5771 photos were taken in 4834 minutes. Taking out all the time to prepare for pictures, putting the flag into the surface, packing specimens of rocks and soil, checking if the LEM had not been damaged, communication equipments set up, "ceremonial" chats with President Nixon, walking to the areas of the moon. Total of 121 Apollo 11 photos were taken, and considering the other tasks that needed to be done, 1.19 photos had to be taken, regardless of the other ACTIVITIES. (TheConspiracyZone) ===

<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> 3. How is this flag waving? There was noone to touch it! (APOLLO 15 FLAG)
media type="custom" key="3901683" ===<span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255); background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">The Apollo 15 Flag at around 2:37 is seen to be waving without anyone touching it ===

<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> 4. Why would Apollo 11 fake a footage of Earth when it was 130,000 miles away?
media type="custom" key="3901687"' ===<span style="background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">video of a fake footage of showing a fake moon when Apollo 11 is supposedly going to the moon. === ===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> 5. The maximum computer memory at the time had been only 32 kilobytes. How did the Apollo 11 astronauts land on the moon with the computer hardrive of a simple calculator? === ===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">6. Why were the Moon Buggy and Lunar Module blueprints destroyed when they were thought to be one of the greatest achievements in history? === ===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">7. An Ex-Nazi, NASA Moon Rock Scientist went to Antartica two months later? Why? Was it to collect rocks that would look similar to those on the moon? (Moon Landing Hoax Top 10 Reasons) ===

[[image:11aldrinaccoutermentsfb9.jpg width="260" height="360"]]
<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">Back To Top

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype', 'Book Antiqua', Palatino, serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);">
<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype', 'Book Antiqua', Palatino, serif;"> ===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype', 'Book Antiqua', Palatino, serif;">The purpose of sending the three astronauts to the Moon had been to succeed the “political goal” of the issue, which was to give the world proof that the United States of America was better than the Soviet Union. Also, the impacts on the world had been that science and engineering had developed and progressed much further than before. (Irvine) Most of the countries in the world had been affected by this space race from the fact that if the Soviet Union had landed on the moon, every country in the world would have become a target for them. The countries that had become allies with the wrong "superpower" may indeed become the enemy of the country that had landed on the moon. It had a great affect in the decisions of countries choosing one of the two sides; the United States or the Soviet Union. ===

<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype', 'Book Antiqua', Palatino, serif;">
===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype', 'Book Antiqua', Palatino, serif;">I believe that NASA would have tried to do about anything to get the Apollo 11 men to the moon, even if it took the chances of lying to the whole world. Even if the evidence had been very strong with many unanswered questions asked by the conspiracists, I believe that Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Mike Collins had landed on the moon in creating one of the most historical events in human history. ===

===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype', 'Book Antiqua', Palatino, serif;">From this mission, the whole human race had evolved and, the people changed their views about technology and what the human race could achieve in the space. Whether it was a hoax or not, people would be able to say the Apollo mission to be “One small step for man; and one giant leap for mankind,” because the new ideas that were thought to be impossible that showed to have a possibility of success. NASA has stated that there will in the future, around 2018 be another flight to the moon. After all these years, will NASA be able to prove to the whole world that the mission was genuine? Until then, we will have to wait and see. ===

<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">Back To Top

<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">
===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">http://www.dc8p.com/html/moonhoax.html <span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> ===

<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">
<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> media type="custom" key="3903303"

media type="custom" key="3905357" ===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64); background-color: rgb(192, 192, 192);">This isn't really true. Videos just to show humor and to show that conspiracists may have created fake videos to try to prove their argument. <span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> ===

<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">
<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">

<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> Some examples are..
===<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;"> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5MVVtFYTSo ( <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">HIGHLY RECOMMENDED <span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">) <span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">for people who want to learn more about Apollo 11 Conspiracy ===

<span style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">Apollo 1 A1AR
===<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">To learn more about the Apollo 11 Mission go to <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif; color: rgb(64, 64, 64);"> http://www.nasa.gov/vision/space/features/apollo11_35th.html ===

<span style="font-family: arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13px; font-weight: normal; line-height: 19px;">[[image:astronaut-02.gif width="236" height="205"]]
<span style="font-family: 'Palatino Linotype','Book Antiqua',Palatino,serif;">Back To Top